Menu
 
ScotCen Social Research that works for society You are on scotcen

You are on the Natcen site

Click here for Scotcen

natcen map

You are on the Natcen site

Click here for Scotcen

natcen map

More of the poorest single parents receive child maintenance payments from their child’s other parent – but the majority still get nothing

05 June 2013 | Tags: child maintenance, families, poverty

Two thirds (64%) of single parents on out-of-work benefits do not receive any child maintenance from their child's other parent

However, the proportion that do increased from one quarter (24%) to one third (36%) between 2007 and 2012, according to research published today by Gingerbread, NatCen and BPSR and funded by the Nuffield Foundation.

The research also shows that child maintenance, where it is paid, plays a key role in lifting children out of poverty; but that some parents are unable to make private arrangements and will continue to depend on the Child Support Agency (CSA), despite government plans to charge them for using the statutory service in future.


Maintenance lifts more children out of poverty

Prior to 2008, single parents on benefit who received more than £10 a week in maintenance were subject to a pound for pound deduction in their benefits. This policy was abolished in 2010, and in 2012 the average amount received was £23 a week. For one in five (19%) parents on benefit who receive maintenance, this income has lifted them and their children out of poverty.

However, the research also shows that one in four (25%) of those who do receive payments do not receive the full amount agreed on a regular basis.


The Child Support Agency (CSA) is the only option for some parents

The proportion of single parents on benefit who arrange payments privately has increased since the requirement to use the Child Support Agency (CSA) was lifted in 2008 (from 4% to 20%). However, over a third (37%) of single parents on benefit still use the CSA to arrange payments. Just under half (43%) of all single parents on benefit have no arrangement in place.

The research shows that private arrangements for paying maintenance are difficult to sustain over time: although four in ten (40 per cent) single parents on benefit had or had tried to have a private arrangement at some point, half had since moved to having a CSA arrangement or no arrangement at all.

The researchers recommend that these findings are considered by the government in its current redesign of the child maintenance system. The government's aim is to support greater numbers of separated parents to make their own private maintenance arrangements, and plans include the introduction of charging for parents who use the statutory new Child Maintenance Service (which will replace the CSA) to collect their maintenance.

The study compares data collected from a 2012 telephone survey of 760 single parents on benefits and 40 in depth interviews with data from the 2007 Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) Survey of Relationship Breakdown.

Teresa Williams, Director of Social Research and Policy at the Nuffield Foundation said:

"These findings show the difference child maintenance can make in lifting families out of poverty. This is particularly important, because family income plays a significant and independent role in children's outcomes. While the increase in the number of children receiving financial support from their non-resident parent is a positive development, we need to focus on how this can be extended to the majority, who currently receive nothing."

Fiona Weir, Chief Executive of Gingerbread said:

"These lessons could not come at a more important time. The government is soon to start shutting down the CSA, replacing it with a system that charges single parents to have their maintenance collected when the other parent won't pay. Introducing charges where private agreements haven't worked risks making some of the most vulnerable parents even poorer - either because they have no choice but to pay to use the new statutory system, or because they give up on child maintenance altogether."

"At a time when private maintenance agreements are being sold as the best solution for separated parents, this study shows that - for a significant group of single parents - they are simply not feasible."

ENDS

CONTACT: Frances Bright, Communications Manager, Nuffield Foundation on 020 7681 9586 or fbright@nuffieldfoundation.org

Notes

1. A Nuffield Foundation briefing paper introducing the findings from the study is attached. The full report will be available to download from www.nuffieldfoundation.org/kids-aren't-free on Wednesday 5 June.

2.The report, Kids Aren't Free: the child maintenance arrangements of single parents on benefit in 2012 by Caroline Bryson, Amy Skipp, Janet Allbeson, Eloise Poole, Eleanor Ireland and Vicky Marsh is published by Gingerbread.

3. There are around two million single parent families in the UK raising over three million children. Around 750,000 of these single parents are receiving out of work benefits.

4. The Nuffield Foundation is an endowed charitable trust that aims to improve social well-being in the widest sense. It funds research and innovation in education and social policy and also works to build capacity in education, science and social science research. The Nuffield Foundation has funded this project, but the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation.

5. Gingerbread is the national charity working with single parent families. It provides expert information and advice, along with membership and training opportunities, to single parents and their families, and campaigns against poverty, disadvantage and stigma to provide fair and equal treatment and opportunity for them.

6. NatCen Social Research is an independent, not for profit organisation. We believe that social research has the power to make life better. By really understanding the complexity of people's lives and what they think about the issues that affect them, we give the public a powerful and influential role in shaping decisions and services that can make a difference to everyone.

7. Bryson Purdon Social Research LLP (BPSR) is an independent research partnership between Caroline Bryson and Susan Purdon, specialising in quantitative survey methods. As well as providing consultancy and advice on survey and evaluation design, BPSR collaborates with a range of survey organisations, academics and policy interest groups to conduct surveys and evaluations of government policies and programmes.